Category Archive for ‘reading’ rss

2011 In Review

37 today, and another year flows beneath the bridge.  Go quick, don’t they?  From a personal standpoint I moved back into my house and continued the long building project, only now lurching dysfunctionally to a close.  Had a third baby.  Published a fifth book.  The good thing about babies is that they’re actually quite good fun to make, the hard work and expense starts after.  The good thing about books is that, while they’re quite hard work to make, once they’re published they require minimal maintenance and with any luck actually make you money.

A YEAR IN BOOKSELLING – Yeah, I really can’t complain.  Well, I could.  As a venomously ambitious sociopath without the emotions of guilt, shame or regret, it galls me deeply that anyone in the world sells more books than me.  But I really shouldn’t complain.  The Heroes came out in January, made no. 3 on the UK Hardcover bestseller list and stayed in the top ten for four weeks, which makes it by far my fastest selling book.  Didn’t do too badly in the US either, especially in ebook format, which is rapidly becoming a significant slice of the pie, especially from an author’s standpoint as royalty rates can be five, six, even ten times higher than on a heavily discounted paperback.  Various translation deals were done for various books of mine, including first deals in Brazil, Italy (which had been strangely stubborn), and simple and complex Chinese.  I think that puts the Blade Itself in about 25 languages now, though don’t ask me to list them.  All 3 of the First Law books have now sold over 100,000 copies in their various UK editions.  You’d be amazed how hard it is to get reliable sales figures, especially from overseas, but in all languages and editions of all my books we reckon we’re at well over a million sold.  And all this for a load of nonsense I dreamed up in the middle of the night purely for my own amusement.  I really shouldn’t complain.

A YEAR IN BOOK WRITING – I will admit, not my best.  I’ve written about two thirds of the first draft of A Red Country so far, and I reckon it’s going to need a fair bit of work when it’s finished.  Indeed a couple of chapters near the front might well need total rewriting from scratch, which will be the first time I’ve ever really done anything along those lines.  Why the slightly disappointing work rate?  The house was a mess when we first moved in and serious work didn’t end til April.  Then my new baby appeared, the eldest started school, Skyrim was released … so many distractions, so many excuses, and attempts to routinise the working day haven’t really panned out yet.  Hard to believe I wrote Last Argument of Kings in about 14 months while still working more or less full time as an editor.  But then I had no kids (or just the one baby towards the end) and a long-established plan to work from.  Full time authorship is a bit of a different deal, with an awful lot of additional stuff to do.  But I’ve had a good few days since Christmas, as it goes, and I’m hopeful I can hit my stride a little better next year.  We shall see…

BOOKS – This year I have been reading mostly fiction and non-fiction related to the American West.  Non-fictionally I’d say the best thing was actually Ken Burns’ TV documentary series on the subject.  A lot of the non-fiction books have been a little dry and specific – if anyone knows of any really good western non-fiction do comment below.  Some of the fiction’s been great, though.  Pete Dexter’s Deadwood, Elmore Leonard’s Western Short Stories, AB Guthrie’s The Big Sky and Richard Matheson’s Journal of the Gun Years were some of the highlights.  Call me ridiculous but I don’t think I’ve read a single fantasy or sf book this year.  Just haven’t really had the time.  One of these days, probably when I’ve finished the latest book, I’ll have to sit down and crack through a few recent genre classics that I might pontificate at length about just how far short of my stuff they fall…

TV and FILM – I may have interviewed George RR Martin about Game of Thrones for Sky TV, but I haven’t actually got to see the series yet.  How indescribably lame is that?  The televisual highlight was probably the first two series of cynical Danish procedural The Killing, with Spartacus: Blood and Sand providing some gore-daubed entertainment in the background.  Film wise I can’t think of much new that really floated the boat for me this year.  The Conan re-imagining sucked.  X-Men First Class was surprisingly good.  Otherwise I shrug my shoulders and concede that Unforgiven, Lonesome Dove and Deadwood are as brilliant as they ever were.

GAMES – Excellent year again.  Skyrim was my game of the year in the face of tough competition, and redefined fantasy roleplaying.  Dragon Age II didn’t.  Rage was kinda rubbish.  Deus Ex was kinda alright.  Dark Souls was fascinating but so, so hard.  LA Noire was fascinating but so, so flawed.  InFamous 2 and Arkham City were both excellent but perhaps lacked that special spark.  Resistance 3 I thought was very impressive, I don’t think I’ve seen so original and atmospheric a first person shooter in a long time, not that it’s my genre of choice mind you.  Uncharted 3 I’m playing now and all I can say is those guys can do a grandstand sequence like no one else.  It’ll probably be my no. 2 for this year.  Very much looking forward to the new Mass Effect in the new year, though…

BEST REVIEWS – There was a fair amount of praise for The Heroes even if I say so myself.  In the UK I managed to pull off the not inconsiderable feat of uniting The Guardian (“it’s imbued with cutting humour, acute characterisation and world-weary wisdom about the weaknesses of the human race. Brilliant.”) and The Sun (“Don’t miss it or you deserve to be gutted like a stuck pig, your entrails left to feed the crows.”) in enthusiasm.  Time magazine called it, ‘a magnificent, richly entertaining account of a single three-day battle’, while SFX said ‘an action-packed novel full of brutality, black humour and razor-sharp characterisation,’ and gave it all the stars they had.  Five, in case you were wondering.  I could go on.  No?  Oh.  I’ll leave the last word to Sci-Fi Now, who in their latest issue have declared The Heroes their best book of 2011.  No, seriously, they have: “Some books successfully capture the geist of the times and speak to the evolving expectations of the genre’s readers … this cynical, gritty, and realistic fantasy homage to the epic war movie is character-driven writing of the highest order.  It’s bleak and thoroughly modern view of human nature through a dark fantasy lens is a showcase for how much the genre has changed, and why Abercrombie holds his position at the forefront of British Fantasy.”  Zing!

BEST WORST REVIEW – The usual crop of amazon one-starrings, blog-lashings, accusations of overratings and offhand chat-room pastings, but one meaty slice of criticism bestrid the others as ’twere a colossus over pygmies, and it was, of course, Leo Grin’s fire and brimstone assault upon modern fantasy or, as he had it, “postmodern blasphemies against our mythic heritage” and “Abercrombie’s jaded literary sewer” in particular.  And a proper storm in the internet teacup ensued, didn’t it, though?  My own response became my most commented-upon post of this year or, indeed, ever, by some considerable margin, with 224 comments and 26 trackbacks.  I cannot imagine that I have ever seen so many people resolving to buy and read my work as I did in the wake of that article.  Proof, if any were needed, that there is truly no such thing as bad publicity.  I can only hope that I continue to “shock, outrage, offend and dishearten,” critics everywhere in the months to come.  I’d say it’s a virtual certainty…

Happy new year, readers!

Lies and Firsts

I note in passing that my dark masters at Gollancz have re-issued Scott Lynch’s The Lies of Locke Lamora with a retro yellow cover reminiscent of the early 60s in order to celebrate the fiftieth anniversary of the imprint:

THE fantasy debut of 2006, other than mine.  The book, of course, is a wretched tissue of laboured plot-devices, tin-ear dialogue, slovenly world-building and all around hackery.  But this edition is worth the price of admission for the superlative introduction and fetching cover alone.  My advice?  Read the introduction, cut the cover off, then toss the rest away.

In other news, Tor.com are considering the openings of various fantasy series in collaboration with Barnes and Noble buyer Jim Killen in their First in Fantasy series.  Ron Hogan kicks off by considering The Blade Itself:

The Blade Itself could almost read as a grim, ultraviolent parody of A Song of Ice and Fire, with hyper-accelerated political intrigue covered in blood and guts and shot through with savagely dark humor…”

Almost?  What do you mean almost?

“…except that Abercrombie works hard to keep even the most venal or manipulative of his primary characters well-rounded.”

Oh, yeah, that.  I accept your retraction.

Year End 2010

Happy birthday to me, happy birthday to me, happy birthday dear me-eeeee.

Yes, indeed, the candle has almost burned right down on another year, and I’m thirty six today.  When the hell did that happen?  It’s been a busy couple of years, what with one thing and another.  Five months looking for a house, finding a house, and buying a house.  Eleven months living in it, largely untouched for forty years and the wiring and plumbing for a lot longer, without such niceties as showers, decent windows, or working drains, while we planned what we were going to do with it.  Then eight months living in a rented place while the builders stripped the house back to the bare bones and beyond, extended, renovated and otherwise created the house of our dreams … or occasionally nightmares.  Hard work, this stuff, even if I didn’t do any of the actual work myself.  You watch Grand Designs, and they say things like, “wow, this is really hard work,” and you think, “yeah, whatever.”  But man, this is really hard work.  Most stressful thing I’ve ever done, I would say.  Anyway, yesterday, we moved back in.  Wa-hey!  Crack the champagne!  Or maybe, you know, just a can of coke or something, ’cause I’m really knackered, and there’s still a lot to do.

A lot for the builders to do, both inside and outside, and a lot for us to do shifting furniture around, discovering those things that have exceeded expectations and those things that have fallen short (malfunctioning central heating, I’m looking at you) and otherwise getting things the way we want them, but we’re in the house.  We’re in.  Now, I hope, I will have more time to do things like, I don’t know, write stuff.  And maybe blog, and reply to email, and sit staring out the window with an enigmatic smile upon my face like what writers are supposed to ain’t they?  But probably some other piffling destraction, like book tours or children or whatever will get in the way.  Still, we can hope.  We can dream.

An odd year, this one, 2010, in the sense that, for the first time in four years, the first time since 2006, I didn’t have a new book out.  At least in the UK or US.  So no doubt I shall be cruelly excluded from consideration in the various year’s best lists, not to mention next year’s glittering prizes.  So no Pulitzer, Booker or Nobel next year.  Well, the Nobel is given for a body of work rather than an individual book, so I suppose that’s still very much on the cards, in fact.  I shall wait by the phone for the committee’s call.  But while I wait, I could always tell you of some things that I’ve enjoyed this year:

FILM: You know, nowt really stands out for me.  Not that I’ve seen much at the cinema, since parenthood tends to keep me away.  I was enjoying Toy Story 3 until my elder daughter insisted on leaving because it was “too boyish”.  As for the rest, Star Trek – Kack.  Inglorious Basterds – Pretty Kack.  Hurt Locker – Bit Meh.  Inception – Very Meh.  Do you know what, I think the most interesting thing I saw was a very old black and white film about the aftermath of the second world war from the point of view of various veteran inhabitants of a small town, called “The Best Years of Our Lives.”  Predates the hollywood decency rubbish, and is surprisingly vibrant and modern in its characterisation.

TV: Again, can’t think of much that has truly electrified me.  The Wire, The Shield, Battlestar Galactica, Deadwood have all gone.  Pacific seems like real crud compared to Band of Brothers.  House is always good.  Breaking Bad is good.  Damages is good.  But nothing’s really knocking the socks off lately.  Roll on Game of Thrones…

GAMES: Now this is more like it.  A truly vintage year, with the latest generation of consoles seeming to have finally come of age.  Red Dead Redemption was my number one game of this year, with Assassin’s Creed: Brotherhood and Fallout: New Vegas coming in two and three among a lot of stiff competition.

BOOKS: That there The Heroes was pretty damn awesome, wasn’t it?  Oh no, wait, you lot haven’t read that yet.  A ha ha.  As per usual, it’s mostly been non-fiction for me this year, and mostly on the subject of WAR by way of research and preparation for the aforementioned The Heroes, and the book that really stood out for me was David Finkel’s The Good Soldiers, a non-fictional account of one unit’s involvement in Iraq, but with a fictional eye for theme and character.  Top stuff.  Sebastian Junger’s War wasn’t bad either…

Let pop the corks.  Or at least the ringpulls.  See you in 2011, suckers…

Best Of…

Happy Birthday to Me. Happy Birthday to Me. Happy Birthday dear me-eeeee…

Yes indeed, another year of dry humour, wet nappies, sleepless nights, wonderful reviews, shitty reviews, and storming success drags to a close. So long 2009! Nice knowing you. A busy year, for me. I had a baby. I moved from London to Bath. I sold a flat and bought one. I even published another book! With all these good things to celebrate, one wonders why I still feel slightly anxious all the time. It’s the modern condition, people!

An end, as well, to another year of blogging. Shall we look back to some of the highlights…?

Most Commented On Blog Post
Storming up the charts with 80 comments was my response to my favourite review of the year “People suck, war is bad, and the world is a bottomless shithole,” which included, alongside the trademark apparently self-deprecating while actually being self-glorifying wit, some thoughtful introspection on the subject of ragged and unhappy endings. It even managed to beat last year’s 60 comment winner. Proof positive, as if any were needed, that thought-provoking consideration of genre issues CAN be more interesting than being hit over the head with a piece of wood. A score for the intelligentsia. Runners up were an opportunity for you all to bitch about my US cover (always popular), with 55 comments, and my musings on my neighbour’s teenage son never having heard of Dungeons & Dragons, with 42. Perhaps if I can think of more worthwhile and thoughtful posts to make I can break the 100 mark next year. No. I don’t think so either…

Best Foreign Trip
I might have felt strangely sick the whole time I was there for no apparent reason, but Sweden/Norway your streets is clean, your trains is reasonable yet punctual, your people is friendly and above averagely good-looking, and your sf&f specialist bookstores is excellent. I also remain a committed fan of your modernist minimal design, unassuming royal families, and efficient education, health, and welfare systems.

Best Authorial Bitch-Fight involving me
Was definitely the no-holds-barred grudge match between me and Brent Weeks at the Borders Book Blog wich I totally won. Ask anyone. There’s even some talk that we’ll be taking this show on the road next year…

Best Authorial Love-In involving me
My thoughtful yet hilarious interview with Patrick Rothfuss on the occasion of his recent charity drive.

Best Authorial Blurb about my Works
Has to be the George RR Martin. I still feel deeply smug about that one.

Best “Best SF&F of 2009″ list of 2009
Werthead demonstrates his impeccable good taste by selecting Best Served Cold as his best book of 2009, saying, “a tale of revenge, murder, assassination, war and generally pleasant stuff, with Abercrombie somehow outstripping the first trilogy in terms of mayhem.” Graeme demonstrated an equal level of discernment - “It delivered on all fronts and just kept delivering.” The redoubtable Dave Bradley, editor of SFX, has also declared Best Served Cold his best book of 2009 calling it a “brilliantly brutal tale of revenge”. I note in passing he also had Dragon Age up there. Nice call, Dave. Rob Grant’s taste at Sci-Fi London would have been as good if it weren’t for that pesky Jesse Bullington and his bleak medieval european stylings…

Best Served Cold has popped up on a few other lists too. Fantasy Book Critic’s, Joe Sherry’s , even the editor’s picks for sf&f at amazon.co.uk, where I stand proudly among such notables as Terry Pratchett, Jane Austen, and Stephanie Meyer. It’s a varied crowd over there…

But lest we over-sugar the pudding, Best Served Cold also made Western author Iain Parnam’s most disappointing books of 2009. He thought, “everyone is repellent, the story is dreary, nothing matters much, and the wit is missing.” I shrug me a river. It’s all subjective, people.

Books
I know what you’re thinking – who the hell reads books any more? But this year I managed to get through a few, and some of them weren’t even written by me. Non-fiction highlight would probably be CV Wedgewood’s Thirty Years War. A classic of narrative history. Fiction highlight? Despite some tough competition from the likes of Fritz Leiber, Junot Diaz and Jeff Vandermeer, you’d have to walk a very long way through a post-apocaplyptic wasteland to beat Cormac McCarthy’s The Road. Searingly stark and bleak, but somehow still life-affirming. Like a visit to Brooks Nightclub in Lancaster used to be.

Films
Well I must say my socks were quite blown off by Avatar, it may well have been the most jaw-dropping cinema experience for me since Fellowship of the Ring, way back in 1904 when I didn’t have kids, but along somewhat more traditional lines District 9 and No Country for Old Men were certainly memorable too. Watchmen … not so much.

TV
Battlestar Galactica ended more with a whimper than a bang, which left the final season of The Shield as my TV Highlight. That certainly ended with a bang. IN YOUR FACE. Michael Chiklis also stalks off with my coveted “Most Loathsome yet Strangely Sympathetic Bald Character” award. Mad Men continued to be great, second series of Dexter was good but, for my money, not as good as the last. Other things that have variously titillated, intrigued and amused included 30 Rock, True Blood, and, of course, Strictly Come Dancing. What am I going to DO with my Sunday mornings now it’s over?

Games
Good year, good year. Despite tough competition from the old-school roleplaying of Dragon Age and the Medici-stabbing thrills of Assassin’s Creed II, it has to be the smooth-as-velvet next-generation adventure charms of Uncharted II t
hat gave my boat the most float this year. The importance of PC games seems to be very much dwindling for me, as console games gradually invade the rpg and srategy territory that was traditionally theirs. Medieval:Total War is possibly my favourite game of all time, so I found Empire to be a tad disappointing. I haven’t played it a lot since I lack a PC powerful enough to run it well, but the AI seems kind of rubbish to me. It usually takes them a year or two to get those games properly balanced, though, so who knows. Perhaps a future classic…

And there we have it. Let rip the party poppers. Roll on 2010…

Wolfsangel

My 200th post. Who ever would have predicted that I wouldn’t have got bored and given up by now? But no, here I am, still avoiding doing real work. Perhaps it was kind of predictable after all…

But Christmas is coming, and what better time to recommend things that none of you will be able to get for months? Wolfsangel, by MD Lachlan is being published by Gollancz next year (which is how come I’ve got hold of a manuscript), and it is a strange brew indeed. Part fantasy, part horror, part historical adventure, bound up with a tight, lean style and featuring some of the strangest and most sinister magic I’ve encountered.

It’s set in dark ages scandinavia so, you know, vikings and that, but supposes that some of the magical elements of norse myth are real. Or kind of real. Maybe. So in one sense it’s set in our world, but in another it reminded me of Robert Low’s excellent The Whale Road in that it manages to evoke the weirdness of the viking mindset to the point where even the normal people feel a lot more alien than most denizens of epic fantasy. It’s savage, dark, strange and unpredictable, which are all good things in my book.

I guess if I had to be critical (and you know how much I hate doing that) I’d say that I felt the book was at its most effective when it stayed pretty firmly anchored in the real – or at least in the viking world rather than the full-on magical one. Towards the end the magical elements came more and more to the fore while the politics, warfare and viking life dropped away. I wouldn’t say it lost it’s way, but it found it’s way to some pretty strange ground alright.

But overall, a dark and original book, recommended for people who like weird magic, unpredictable outcomes, gore, and vikings, which, let’s face it, is probably everyone who reads this blog…

The Magicians

So some time back in June some guy called Lev Grossman emails me and asks (very politely), since his book is paired with mine on amazon uk, whether I’d fancy reading it, since he was getting a copy of Best Served Cold. I was like, “yeah, whatever, free book.” If I had known then that Lev Grossman was in fact the book critic for Time Magazine, I would have been far more sycophantic in my correspondence. Far more.

Took a while for the book to arrive, and believe me, it’s a beautiful looking hardcover on which serious design effort has been expended, with the deckled edges, and the author’s initials stamped into the book under the dustjacket, and a lavish map not printed craply across two pages but on proper end sheets and what have you. It also begins with a quote from one of my favourite speeches from Shakespeare, so we were off to a good start, I can tell you.

Anyway – Quentin Coldwater is a super-clever nerd depressive who hates his life and is obsessed with a series of twee fantasy books about Fillory, an invented land highly reminiscent of Narnia. Everything seems to change when he passes an entrance exam to a school of magic in upstate New York and is trained to be a magician, but magic turns out to pose more problems than it solves…

I guess you could say – if you were fond of incompetently describing things by likening them to things it’s only superficially like, which, of course, I am – that there’s a Harry Potter meets Narnia meets Catcher in the Rye vibe about it. I’m not sure if it’s fair to say that Grossman is trying to do with Harry Potter and Narnia something not entirely unlike what I’m trying to do with Lord of the Rings and the Belgariad, that is to present a story that is self-consciously classic with a grittier, more realistic, more morally ambiguous spin and a slightly ironic raised eyebrow at its source material. In general, I think he’s been pretty successful, sometimes very – it’s sharply observed, it’s surprising, it’s often funny, sometimes very imaginative and occasionally quite scary, and ultimately gets you thinking, which is good thing for any book to do.

Some mild spoilers will follow, so the obsessive compulsive should look away. The book splits into four sections. In the first and much the largest Quentin attends magic school from entrance exam to graduation. For me this was the least effective, but that may well be because (gasp) I’ve never read any Harry Potter so I was missing a lot of references. In the third part Quentin and some of his friends (or not) travel to magical Fillory. This I felt was much more effective – the contrast between the wondrous location with its naiads and talking animals and the banality of the misfiring adolescent relationships and d&d; flavoured in-jokes of the protagonists allowed for a lot of laughs. Plus when magic began to be used in anger, it was pretty shocking.

But oddly for a book about magic (or perhaps not oddly, since it’s really about the relationship between the fantastical and the humdrum), I found it was at its most powerful when it was at its most mundane. Soul-destroying holidays in grey Brooklyn after the wonders of termtime delving into the mysteries of the universe. Loafing around in banal New York, bored, trying to work out what to do with one’s life after graduating. The best part for me was the last, in which Quentin abandons his godlike powers in order to live a tedious existence as a mid-level executive in a Manhattan office block. The depictions of magic were often fascinating, but they didn’t have the ring of truth about them (how could they, they’re magic), the depictions of depression, of boredom, of ennui definitely did, and it was the honesty of those that really made this book work for me…

The Brief, Wondrous Road of Oscar Finch

For a man who reads few books, I have read quite a few books recently. Three excellent pieces of fiction in particular, though only one of them could be considered fantasy and that of a rather peculiar and fungus-ridden variety. Still, I warmly recommend all three to anyone capable of reading in English, for they are excellent (as I said above), and all quick, sharp, page-turning reads as well. You could probably fit all three into a hollowed out hardcover of Storm of Swords and have room left over for a banana. And believe me, once you’d finished the last of them, you’d really need that banana.

First up – Junot Diaz’ Pulitzer prize-winning The Brief, Wondrous Life of Oscar Wao. The exodus from the Dominican Republic of Trujillo and the immigrant experience in the US as examined through the eyes of several members of one dysfunctional family. If you expect that the winner of such a heavyweight prize would have to be written in an overbearing, difficult, heavyweight way, then (in this case, at least) you’re WAY wrong. This is airy, readable, conversational, bursting with humour and personality. My mum gave me a great piece of writing advice – always be truthful, always be real, and this book has authenticity in spades. It’s also told partly from the point of view of a geeky child obsessed with Lord of the Rings (among other fantastic and science fictional things) and so is littered with some brilliant genre-based metaphors for those of you who know about that sort of thing (not me, obviously), sometimes hilariously innapropriate (the great dictator, when assassinated, stumbles from his bullet-riddled limousine having taken 400 hit points of damage). There’s one brilliant paragraph in which Diaz manages to use a metaphor from Star Trek and one from John Boorman’s Point Blank. Has he been inside my mind? The book’s split into several parts, each from the point of view of a different member of the extended family, some going back to the 30s and 40s in the Dominican Republic (which is wild, vivid and dangerous enough to virtually qualify as a fantasy world, especially for someone who grew up in 80s Lancaster), some taking place right up to the present day. For me some sections worked better than others, but overall it’s a joyful, characterful, rewarding read.

Next up, Jeff Vandermeer’s Finch. A compromised detective struggles to solve a difficult double murder in a bizarre, crumbling city occupied by enemy forces. So far so noir. Except the enemy are giant mushrooms. I hadn’t read any of Vandermeer’s stuff before, but his reputation is … kinda literary, I guess. All these distinctions are fundamentally bullshit, of course, but nonetheless I was expecting something complicated, difficult, possibly with wild ideas and beautiful writing but perhaps not too much in the way of coherent story. But the writing, though vivid, is tight as a drum, never over-complicated, and the imagination as man meets fungus meets city and all three flow together into a noir nightmare is like nothing else I’ve read. He makes the book work both as a crazy fantasy and as a tough detective story, both parts complimenting the other. If I were to go for a filmic metaphor I might have to say Chinatown meets Naked Lunch with a sprinkling of Tetsuo II: The Bodyhammer. And a side of mushrooms. Giant, man eating, hallucinatory mushrooms. There are a few moments, perhaps, where the forward momentum slackens and we come dangerously close to infodumping, the plot seems to creak a little and there’s a risk that – like a jet fighter driven forward only by its own thrust – it might come crashing to the ground, explode and kill its pilot in an almighty fireball. But then the fungal afterburners kick in and the book blasts once more into the heavens of imagination. Nothing’s fully explained at the end, but that isn’t really the point of a book like this (if there are any other books like this, which there probably aren’t). I read this in proof form, and I don’t think it’s out for a few months, but I strongly advise you to pick up a copy when it does appear because I very much doubt you’ll have read it’s like before. A must for fans of fantasy, noir, great writing, or, of course, fungus.

And so we come to the end. Of this post, and the world. Cormac McCarthy probably doesn’t need my help in drawing the attention of readers to his (also) Pulitzer-winning The Road, since it’s been out for a long time, has been on Oprah and that and sold squillions of copies, and is being made into a film even as we speak with that nice Viggo Mortensen. But if you’ve been frozen in a glacier for the last few years, allow me to expound. The Road is an irripresible comedy of manners that will have you chuckling from the very first page. Perhaps that’s not entirely accurate. Unless by irrepresible comedy of manners you mean ash-blasted post-apocalyptic horrorshow, and by chuckling you mean gripped and harrowed. This is one bleak-ass book, but also a completely magnificent one that in the midst of its brutality, desperation and utter waste somehow manages to be strangely inspiring. I’d read a couple of McCarthy’s books before and found them interesting but difficult to get into, so stripped bare and brutal are the prose, the characters and the events. But the stark and ruthless writing matched the content beautifully in this book, no doubt. Awe-inspiring.

Anything else – er, there’s an interview up with me at SF Signal, should anyone be interested, and with that I’m off to Scandinavia to talk at some bookstores. If any of you will be attending in Stockholm, Gothenberg, or Oslo, I will look forward immensely to seeing you there. The rest of you, I will post when I get back…

Retribution Falls


For the last three or four years I’ve barely been reading at all, mostly because the times I would once have spent with a book (tube journeys to and from work mostly) I’ve tended to spend on my own writing – either staring into space and thinking about things or slashing at print-outs with a red pen. In an effort to redress this shameful situation and recharge the batteries of inspiration somewhat I’ve been reading quite a bit since the new year, mostly non-fiction about WAR by way of research and inspiration for my next project.

However, my editor would not stop GOING ON about this book she’d been working on, and my disgust knew no boundaries when I realised it wasn’t one of mine. Naturally I consider praise for any other author a wounding betrayal, particularly since I know the author in question, Chris Wooding, pretty well and run my life thoroughly according to Gore Vidal’s principle of, “every time a friend succeeds a little part of me dies.” So I picked up a proof with the intention of skimming a chapter or two and in the ardent hope of debunking the inflated myth of Wooding’s talent. It hurts me, oh how it hurts me to have to grudgingly lend my mumbling voice to the choir of approval.

The book in question is his forthcoming Retribution Falls. I guess in rough outline you could say it’s something like Firefly (something very like, really, though that’s no bad thing) but with a little steampunky victoriana replacing the wild-west elements of the setting and a sprinkling of magical demon-dust on the top. The Firefly comparison is apt for me, not just in the general outline of “Charming reprobate ship’s Captain tries to scrape a semi-criminal living from a messed-up world in a patched together heap-of-junk ship with the help of a mismatched reprobate crew each with their own demons in the closet (sometimes literally)” but also in the neat combination of swashbuckling excitement and wisecracking patter with sometimes surprisingly hard-edged violence, moral ambiguity, and a cumulative depth. Not depth of a universal point-making kind, necessarily, but depth in terms of its depiction and investigation of a set of flawed characters and the relationships between them. Like Firefly, it pulls the neat trick of sucking you in with pure entertainment value, and delivering substance while you’re not looking.

Usually there will be things that will jerk me out of a reading experience, events or dialogue or constructions that get me thinking, “Yeah? Really? I dunno…” with my eyebrows all slanted. Not so here, really. Each element works well and adds to the whole. It’s smoooooth, like the Commodores. I guess you could criticise it for things it isn’t, if that’s your bag. It isn’t dark and heavy. It isn’t massively original. It isn’t immensely surprising. But that’d be a bit like criticising Usain Bolt for being not that great with a discuss. Erm, he’s a sprinter. Retribution Falls picks you up, and it whisks you swiftly and entertainingly along, and it sets you down with a big smile on your face.

Can’t say fairer than that.

Forthcoming Attractions

Ah, that long, slow lull at the start of the year. Always seems to take a couple of weeks for things to really get moving again, don’t it? Plus I’m in celebration/mourning for the end of my last book, and engaged in that thumb-twiddling period we call thinking about the next book.

So, this month I will mostly be:

1. Doing a round of updates to the website, which hopefully will go live before long, though possibly not until next month, and will include a sizable extract from Best Served Cold. None other than the explosive whole first chapter. Contain your enthusiasm, people! Though you might want a bucket of ice-water handy when I tell you that there might also be a link to a MAP OF STYRIA. I am too good to you. Around the same time, with any luck and a little help from the God of Release Dates, proofs of Best Served Cold should begin to go out, accompanied by, I can pretty much guarantee, outrageous claims on the back cover as to my genius, critical acclaim, exclusivity, commerciality, sales, and sexual prowess which may verge dangerously close to hype. Guard your fragile minds, advance readers, lest you be beguiled. I wonder if it will be with this book or the next that I will suffer a brutal backlash for my surely unsustainable levels of interweb popularity. It only takes one little boy, after all, to pull his finger out of the dyke and say, “you know, I’m not sure Abercrombie’s really all that good…” And before you know it we’ll be swept away by a flood of shit reviews. You mark my words. I’m prepared to weather the storm, though, because, as we all know, it isn’t until you recieve a universal critical crap-panning that the sales really skyrocket…

2. Writing a short story. Yes, that’s right. Never done it before, so it should be interesting. I’m also using it as a bit of a sounding board for some character ideas, as it’s going to feature a set of characters who’ll be central to the NEXT BOOK (see below). The story is for an anthology which I’m quite excited to be a part of, nominally of sword and sorcery stories, although with the convergence of sword and sorcery with epic fantasy into the whole area of edgy fantasy it looks like it will feature contributions from all kinds of exciting new faces on the fantasy scene, seasoned by some well-known, long-established and much-respected names. Can’t say who yet. Won’t be coming along until 2010, though, so fight desperately to contain that excitement, people!

3. And, of course, planning for that all important NEXT BOOK. The strange life of the author, wherein I’m pondering the next book six months before most readers will get to read the last, such that by the time it comes out, I’m thoroughly buried in the next project where praise or criticism for the last are both equally burdensome. Oh yes (you can’t see, but I’m beating my chest), it is so terribly hard to be a maverick creative! Anyway, let it never be said that I keep you in the dark. The next (fifth) book will be a standalone not unlike Best Served Cold - that is taking place in the world of the First Law and featuring some minor characters from the trilogy in more central roles – but if you can think of Best Served Cold as Dark Fantasy meets Hard-Boiled Thriller, this book will be a kind of Dark Fantasy meets Hard-Edged War Story, and will be the thrilling tale of one great battle for control of the North, over the course of three days, from several points of view on both sides and at different levels of the action. Characters will include – a world weary crew of Named Men, a keen young lad desperate to become a hero and claim a name of his own, a Prince determined to regain his father’s lost throne by any means necessary, a girl who may or may not be able to talk to god, and a fencing champion dispatched to the North as the King of the Union’s observer. Naturally there’ll be blood on the snow, blood in the mist, blood in the rain, blood on standing stones, treachery, heroism, cowardice, and blood. Oh, and hilarious banter. And blood. Current, but very, very rough no-promises-made-please-don’t-hurt-me-if-I-miss-it projected publication date is October 2010.

And yes, I have a working title, and no, I’m not telling you what it is. Like all the best strip-tease artists, I must retain some shred of mystery, you know…

4. Tangential to number 3, above, I’m doing something that’s been virtually unheard of for me over the last few years, and doing some actual reading in the hope of getting some ideas and inspiration. Not fantasy, of course, because, you know, who reads that crap? But a lot of books, fiction and non-fiction, about WAR, from Clausewitz and Sun Tzu, to Grant’s Memoirs, to Vietnam combat experiences. And actually I’ll be reading some war-related fantasy too. So there. One thing I’ve already read which I warmly recommend, is a book called The Whale Road, by Robert Low. It’s about Vikings, and does a great job of communicating the alien-ness of their mindset, partly through some very nice rhythmic writing, which really gets a sense of the characters and their setting across without wasting pages on exposition. I recommend it. A short book which casts a long shadow.

Oh, and additionally, before I forget. Voting for the David Gemmell Legend Award has now begun, in which a sixty-something long-list of pretty much everything published by a sf/f imprint last year will be reduced to a shortlist of five for further voting to establish the bestest heroicest fantasiest book published last year. We all know the answer to that, right? Whatever THEY may say. Now normally I’d step back, dignified, like, ’cause I’m nothing if not dignified, and let the chips fall where they may. But the organisers have contacted me (as they have all the other folks on the longlist) to ask that I help publicise the award on my website. Therefore:

VOTE FOR ME! VOTE FOR ME! LAST ARGUMENT OF KINGS FTW! YOU KNOW YOU WANT TO.

That is all.

The Other The Blade Itself

So I’ve just done a little piece for a website called Writer’s Read, a website where writers say … what they read. Shockingly, I have actually been reading something recently. Thought I’d crosspost it here:

Over the last couple of weeks – in an airport, on a flight, and standing on the stairs for an hour this evening – I have been reading an exciting first novel that has set its genre aflame, called The Blade Itself.

I know what you’re thinking. “But isn’t that your book? How dare you promote it in such a barefaced manner? You pompous arse!” And you’d be right. I am a pompous arse. But not for that reason. Because although I have been reading an exciting first novel entitled The Blade Itself, the genre it set aflame was not fantasy but crime, and the author was not me, but a very pleasant young man from Chicago called Marcus Sakey.


Allow me to explain. It was, I think, several months after I sold my book, The Blade Itself, to a publisher, but several months before it was published, that I became aware that someone else had sold a book called The Blade Itself in the US. There is no hint of copying, the timing makes it impossible, we had simply, simultaneously, picked the same title, derived from a quote from Homer’s Odyssey, “the blade itself incites to violence.” Great minds think alike, I guess. And mine. When The Blade Itself was optioned for a film a few months ago I received a welter of congratulations from readers. A welter which greatly surprised me, since my agent had not been in touch. It was, in fact, Marcus Sakey’s book, The Blade Itself, which had been taken to the bosom of Hollywood. In Siena, Italy a couple of weeks ago, my wife needed a book for the flight, so we stopped into a bookshop to peruse the English Language section. As I occasionally do when in a bookshop, I checked to see if my books were in stock. They did have The Blade Itself. You guessed it. Marcus Sakey’s The Blade Itself.

So I thought I’d check it out. And I’m glad I did. It’s a recognisable style of story – guy with a shady past makes good but his shady past comes back to haunt him – but it’s nicely written with some good characterisation, a strong eye for detail, and the tough prose one would expect. At times I felt the plot tended to drive the characters rather than the other way around, but the build up and climax really were cracking, hence my finishing the book standing on the stairs. All in all a great piece of crime writing, and I look forward to reading whatever else Sakey puts out. Providing none of it shares titles with any of my other books, of course….

So my advice? Read The Blade Itself. Both of ‘em.